<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Custom Camo Your Weapon Army Style.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.customgearreport.com/main/2010/05/custom-camo-your-weapon-army-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.customgearreport.com/main/2010/05/custom-camo-your-weapon-army-style/</link>
	<description>The Latest in Custom Tactical and EDC Gear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGR</title>
		<link>http://www.customgearreport.com/main/2010/05/custom-camo-your-weapon-army-style/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>CGR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.customgearreport.com/main/?p=822#comment-728</guid>
		<description>I find it kinda funny that we were painting our weapons back in 95 in the 3/187 Scout Platoon. M16&#039;s M203&#039;s and M24&#039;s. Of course we&#039;ve seen soldiers doing it in OIF and OEF. nothing new there. But now it is official. 

Eric&#039;s comments on Soldier Systems mention this only applying to the M16/M4, not authorized for other systems, being rejected from turn in etc. I know that is the official answer, but lets look at reality. A Commander that is going to authorize painting rifles probably &quot;gets it&quot; and is most likely going to be ok with paining the other systems as well. Hell they didn&#039;t care when it was taboo.  

Going back to my days at Campbell, when we had to turn a weapon in for higher level maintenance for replacement we cleaned it really well, not fun, but we got it done. Something I am sure NCO&#039;s still teach soldiers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it kinda funny that we were painting our weapons back in 95 in the 3/187 Scout Platoon. M16&#8242;s M203&#8242;s and M24&#8242;s. Of course we&#8217;ve seen soldiers doing it in OIF and OEF. nothing new there. But now it is official. </p>
<p>Eric&#8217;s comments on Soldier Systems mention this only applying to the M16/M4, not authorized for other systems, being rejected from turn in etc. I know that is the official answer, but lets look at reality. A Commander that is going to authorize painting rifles probably &#8220;gets it&#8221; and is most likely going to be ok with paining the other systems as well. Hell they didn&#8217;t care when it was taboo.  </p>
<p>Going back to my days at Campbell, when we had to turn a weapon in for higher level maintenance for replacement we cleaned it really well, not fun, but we got it done. Something I am sure NCO&#8217;s still teach soldiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZHDocMi</title>
		<link>http://www.customgearreport.com/main/2010/05/custom-camo-your-weapon-army-style/comment-page-1/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>ZHDocMi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 16:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.customgearreport.com/main/?p=822#comment-727</guid>
		<description>Looks like a good weekend project.  Now we know the &quot;official&quot; way to go about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a good weekend project.  Now we know the &#8220;official&#8221; way to go about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fightandflight</title>
		<link>http://www.customgearreport.com/main/2010/05/custom-camo-your-weapon-army-style/comment-page-1/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>fightandflight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 15:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.customgearreport.com/main/?p=822#comment-726</guid>
		<description>Nice, now there&#039;s an official method to the madness.  All common sense stuff to be sure, but definitely a nice little handout that&#039;s going to go in my Duracoat box in the shop for use as a quick reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, now there&#8217;s an official method to the madness.  All common sense stuff to be sure, but definitely a nice little handout that&#8217;s going to go in my Duracoat box in the shop for use as a quick reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

